Brazil has suspended iPhone sales without power brick and fined Apple. The country’s telecom regulator said on Wednesday that the move was in response to Apple’s refusal to sell a power brick for its devices. Brazil also announced that it would fine Apple $100 million for violating antitrust rules. Apple has previously balked at selling power bricks, saying they hinder innovation and are too expensive to create a viable alternative.
Brazil has suspended sales of iPhones without power bricks for the duration of the country’s electricity crisis, effective Monday. The decision is a response to Apple’s failure to come up with a solution to the issue.
The iPhone 5 and 5S were two of the most popular smartphones in Brazil, and many users are now looking for alternatives. While this may be good news for Apple shareholders, it could also lead to big problems down the line. Without a power brick, these devices are less compatible with Brazilian electricity grids, which could lead to long periods without service or unexpected turns on the grid.
This doesn’t bode well for Apple’s future in Brazil, as it could mean that customers will have to purchase other electronics when they need repairs or new models.
Brazilian authorities announced on Thursday that they had indefinitely suspended sales of the iPhone 6 and 6S due to a lack of power brick, effective immediately. In addition, Apple was fined $1 billion. This decision comes as a surprise to many, as Brazil has been one of the largest iPhone markets in the world. While it is possible that this decision has something to do with new tariffs being put in place by the Trump administration, it is also possible that Apple was not up to par when it came to warranty service.
Brazil charges Apple with contravention of antitrust laws
Brazilian lawmakers have suspended sales of the iPhone without a power brick, after finding that the device posed a health and safety risk. Apple was fined $10 million for failing to comply with the ban. The punishment follows similar actions by regulatory bodies in France, Italy, Spain, Norway and Germany.
The suspension comes as a response to reports of serious injuries and even fatalities involving iPhones. In Mexico City alone, there have been at least three deaths due to apple products since September of last year. Brazilian regulators fear that such incidents will only increase as more people adopt the Apple product.
Apple contests the Brazilian charges :
Brazilian prosecutors charged Apple with violating its rights to free expression and freedom of speech after the iPhone sales suspension without power brick. The decision to suspend sales of the iPhone without a power brick comes as a surprise to Apple, which argues that the suspension is a violation of its rights to fr.
The suspension has reignited debate in Brazil over whether or not Apple deserves its right to sell products there without government approval. In response, Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff announced plans to create a commission to investigate all aspects of technology in order to ensure that they are “acceptable and law-abiding.”
While it is clear that Apple faces challenges in Brazil, it is also clear that the company will fight any accusations of infringement.
The Brazilian court rules in favor of Apple:
Brazil has suspends iPhone sales without power brick and fined Apple for its actions. This action comes as a result of a new law that went into effect on June 25th that prohibits the sale of iPhones with power bricks. This law is meant to protect consumers from being scammed by unscrupulous individuals who would sell them devices that do not have the necessary components to function properly. In addition, Apple was also fined for refusing to provide a power brick in order to sell its iPhone.
Brazil suspends iPhone sales without power brick and fines Apple
Apple was recently sued by Brazil for selling its iPhone without a required power brick. The company has since announced that it will be suspending all sales of the devices in the country until it receives a proper power supply. This event sets a precedent for other countries considering similar decisions, as it strengthens Apple’s position Hypothetically speaking, if Apple were to face legal action for selling products without needed accessories or components, this could pave the way for others to follow suit.